Enhancing Aviation Safety: Expert Insights, Tips, and Updates from SMS-Pro

Introduction: Navigating SORA for UAS Safety

The rapid rise of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) has transformed aviation, with drone operations projected to contribute $63 billion to the global economy by 2025, per IATA. However, advanced operations like Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS) or Operations Over People (OOP) carry significant risks, requiring robust safety frameworks.

The Specific Operations Risk Assessment (SORA), developed by JARUS and adopted by the European Union Aviation Safety Agency as an Acceptable Means of Compliance (AMC) for Regulation (EU) 2019/947, provides a structured methodology to assess and mitigate these risks. SORA ensures UAS operations in the Specific Category meet safety standards comparable to manned aviation, aligning with ICAO Annex 19.

FAA Part 5 Compliance as a Top Priority

FAA Part 5, expanded in April 2024, mandates Safety Management Systems (SMS) for Part 121 airlines, Part 135 operators, and Part 145 MROs, making compliance a top concern for aviation safety managers and accountable executives.

Non-compliance risks penalties, operational disruptions, and reputational damage, with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) reporting over 90% of operators scrambling to meet deadlines. SMS Pro, a leading aviation SMS software, streamlines compliance with its 77+ modules, including offline auditing, custom reporting, and gamified engagement.

Introduction: Fatigue’s Threat to Aviation Safety

Fatigue is a critical risk in aviation, contributing to 70–80% of incidents by impairing cognitive function, reaction times, and decision-making. From pilots on long-haul flights to MRO technicians working night shifts, fatigue undermines safety across operations. The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) mandate Fatigue Risk Management Systems (FRMS) within Safety Management Systems (SMS) to mitigate this threat, as outlined in ICAO Annex 19 and FAA Part 5 (expanded in 2024 to include Part 145 MROs).

Under CAR 702, 703, 704, 706, 571, and 573??

In Canada, the requirement for a formal Safety Management System (SMS) under the Canadian Aviation Regulations (CARs) applies to specific categories of air operators and organizations, as outlined in CAR 107 and related subparts.

Based on the regulations and their applicability to CAR 702, 703, 704, 706, 571, and 573, here’s which of these require a formal SMS as of year 2025:

As an aviation safety manager or accountable executive, preparing for an FAA Part 5 Safety Management System (SMS) audit is critical to ensuring compliance and maintaining a robust safety culture.

The FAA’s Part 5 regulation, outlined in 14 CFR Part 5, mandates SMS for certificate holders under Parts

• 121,
• 135,
• 91.147, and
• certain Part 21 operations.

Effort Needed Employee Participation in Aviation Safety Programs

The more people involved in the aviation field take advantage of these aviation safety programs, the safer the industry is likely to be.

Encouraging participation in these programs can be as simple as word of mouth referrals or posting program information on bulletin boards at the local fixed base operator (FBO).

However, safety promotion efforts alone are seldom enough to motivate employees to actively involve themselves in a safety program.

A Culture of Respect

In order to understand the idea of safety culture within the aviation industry, we must first understand the respect attributed to:

• Pilots;
• Mechanics;
• Controllers;
• Dispatchers; and
• All others needed to make the system function.

What’s in a Name?

Identifying hazards is a big part of implementing a Safety Management System or SMS. Most of us assume that we know what a hazard is. It’s not a complicated word, we’re pretty sure we know what it means. No problem, right?

Problem is, hazard might be one of the most misunderstood words in the English language. Probably because a lot of definitions you’ll find say something like what Google tells us, “a danger or risk.” From this, we could gather that a hazard and a risk are the same.

Safety Management Systems Bore Most Employees

Unlike those who study and create safety management systems (SMS), to the average employee these programs can be boring.

It’s not that the average employee doesn’t value safety; it’s just that they need to see how these programs are beneficial to them personally.

What Are Control Measures?

When you identify a hazard within your organization, the first step is to analyze the risk. If the risk is high, then you need a control measure to reduce risk to acceptable levels.

Any change made to the existing system to reduce risk is a control measure.