Aviation Safety Reporting Cultures Are Suffering
Most safety managers don't have the luxury of a healthy safety reporting culture in their aviation safety management system (SMS). Managers daily struggle to boost their monthly safety reporting metrics by up to 10% of employees, or one report per month for every 10 employees.
In 1976, NASA and the FAA recognized that a neutrally-operated confidential aviation hazard reporting system was required to engender trust among the aviation community. Furthermore, the reason that NASA operates the largest confidential aviation hazard reporting system in the world is due to the fact that these regulators knew that the aviation community was distrustful of any system controlled by the regulatory agencies.
In those earlier days, safety culture was not considered with the importance that it holds today.
Related Aviation Safety Culture Articles
- What Is Safety Culture in the Aviation Industry?
- Examples How to Improve Safety Culture in Aviation SMS - With Resources
- How to Monitor Aviation SMS' Safety Culture Performance
In most aviation cultures today, the "Just Culture" is commonly preached and occasionally practiced. In this article, we shall discuss how safety managers can improve their safety reporting culture with the assistance of a secure, confidential, aviation safety reporting system backed by a non-punitive reporting policy.
What Is a Confidential Safety Reporting System?
Managers and line employees alike must understand what a confidential reporting system actually means and what are their protections. There is often confusion between:
- Anonymous reporting systems; and
- Confidential reporting systems.
Most accountable executives believe in and support "anonymous" reporting. Anonymous reporting of safety issues means exactly what the title proclaims: nobody should know who reported the
- hazard,
- accident,
- incident or
- irregularity.
Furthermore, ethical aviation service providers that profess to have an anonymous hazard reporting system do not dig deeper to investigate who reported the issue. Believe me, I know because I've worked with hundreds.
Difference Between Anonymous and Confidential Safety Reporting
Confidential reporting is where the reporter is not hiding behind a veil of anonymity; however, only the safety team and the reporter know who reported the issue. Modern aviation SMS databases treat confidential safety issues as sensitive issues. Confidentially reported safety concerns are restricted from all other managers, and in most cases, even upper-level executives.
Confidential reports are typically filed when an employee wishes to report safety hazards without the knowledge of his immediate supervisor. After all, the ultimate objective of any safety reporting system is to save lives and protect resources.
For several identified reasons, some department heads discourage reporting all potential safety concerns. They prefer to handle the "small stuff" in an informal manner. Consequently, there is no documentation available to the safety team to identify trends from historical SMS data.
This becomes a real problem that will eventually cost the operator in the long run. Furthermore, the safety culture will never fully mature and decision-making efforts in the predictive risk management phase will be skewed by an incomplete picture of hazards, risks, and the effectiveness of risk controls.
Related Articles on Aviation Hazards, Risks and Control Measures
- Difference Between Hazards, Risks & Control Measures in Aviation SMS
- How to Monitor the Effectiveness of Control Measures
- How to Identify Hazards and Assess Risks in Aviation SMS - With Free Resources
Confidential Aviation Safety Reporting Systems Engender Trust
If your aviation SMS inadvertently leaks an anonymous or confidentially reported safety issue, your safety department may spend years rebuilding lost trust. Safety reporting cultures take considerable time to build up healthy reporting metrics based on demonstrated trust from management. However, safety culture can very quickly erode and stagnate without proper care and sensitivity to reporters' requests for confidentially managing their reported safety concerns.
The purpose of a confidential reporting system is to promote safety for everyone. I don't believe that it is enough for safety managers to simply tell employees that the safety reporting system has anonymous and confidential reporting. This information is typically provided to employees in their initial SMS training. Some operators may remind employees of the confidential reporting system during recurrent SMS training, but the sad truth is that recurrent SMS training isn't a guaranteed activity.
Does your company provide recurrent SMS training? Have you ever had to demonstrate tracking of recurrent SMS training? I hope so, but unfortunately, I see little documentation from approximately 50% of aviation SMS implementations that I review. Recurrent SMS training does not have to be formal classroom training. You can use computer-based training in your SMS database to administer, track, and document recurrent training activities.
I'll get off my soapbox and summarize that regularly reminding employees of the confidential safety reporting system is a best practice. How do you promote the safety reporting system? Most operators stress this point in:
- Safety surveys;
- Safety newsletters;
- Safety posters and banners;
- Lessons learned library; or
- Messages from accountable executives on the electronic message board.
There are many ways for proactive safety managers to continue to preach this song: "anonymous and confidential reporting!"
There will be a few disbelievers, especially in suspicious, toxic safety cultures. After time passes and no repercussions come from the SMS reporting system, employees will begin to trust the system and be more inclined to report hazards to the safety department.
In the long run, this incessant preaching will benefit your safety culture. Product advertisers will often claim that the message must be seen between three to seven times before the message is absorbed. This is called "effective frequency."
Confidential Safety Reporting Systems Critical to Successful SMS
Aviation safety reporting systems remain a critical component of every aviation SMS. Safety reporting, along with auditing processes, fuels the safety assurance processes in an SMS. As safety concerns are submitted, they are processed according to documented risk management processes outlined in the SMS manual.
Anonymous Reporting Causes More Work for Safety Teams
Anonymous reporting is great when employees truly wish to remain unknown. However, this isn't always beneficial to the safety team. There are often cases when more information must be gathered during the risk management investigation phase. Anonymous reporting becomes a burden to the safety team when more information is required.
With this knowledge, safety managers must communicate the difference between anonymous reporting and confidential reporting.
Make sure that anonymous and confidential reporting is highlighted in your aviation SMS safety policy. When these topics are promoted by top management, employees may be skeptical at first; therefore, encourage top management to reinforce anonymous and confidential reporting in your safety newsletters. Proactive safety managers will prepare "canned articles" for operational department heads to publish in safety newsletters under the department head's name. This keeps the department "on message" and allows the safety team control over safety content.
Finally, encourage all employees to submit confidential safety reports whenever possible. This allows the safety team to follow up and manage organizational risk more effectively. If you remember, confidential does not mean "anonymous;" therefore, the safety team can contact the reporter for more information during the investigative process.
How Confidential Reporting Systems Save Lives
How does a confidential reporting system save lives? Most employees won't report freely and honestly when their reports are transparent for the entire organization. And the report that was not reported may be the one that makes a difference between life and death.
There was a study by Heinrich in the 1930 that has become popular today in risk management circles. Heinrich "suggested that the ratio between fatal accidents, accidents, injuries, and minor incidents (often reported as 1-10-30-600, and sometimes called “Heinrich’s Law” or the “Heinrich ratio”) is relatively constant, over time and across companies."
When safety cultures encourage active safety reporting of all potential safety concerns, especially the minor incidents that managers like to handle "informally," the SMS begins to capture valuable data that will serve as practice in the SMS' safety risk management (SRM) and safety assurance (SA) risk management processes. Practicing these minor incidents strengthens the effectiveness of risk controls because these practice "safety issues" allow for more constant monitoring of implemented risk controls.
In conclusion, effective reporting of all safety concerns, no matter how minor, will increase the effectiveness of the SMS and hopefully delay "The Accident."
Related Aviation SMS Manual Articles
- How to Create Your Aviation SMS Manual
- Tips Writing SMS Manuals With Aviation Safety Database Solutions
- 3 Best Practices for Your Aviation SMS Manual
Below are some demo videos of an aviation safety reporting system that supports both anonymous and confidential reporting. If you need some inspiration as to safety reporting processes, please review. Otherwise, if you find that your safety reporting system is hurting your safety culture, contact us. We'd like to be your SMS partner.
Last updated April 2024.