One of the biggest problems in aviation risk management is the misuse or misunderstanding of aviation risk management definitions and concepts. The most common mistakes happen when it comes to the idea of a hazard vs risk.
Often, these two items are either:
Accuracy is very important. Many of your risk management tools and activities depend on basic definitions of these elements. Misidentification can compromise how safety is accounted for and documented.
The implication here is that with an incorrect understanding of hazards and risks, incorrect real-world identification is bound to follow.
Knowing what a hazard is involves identifying the central point of a safety issue. Hazard identification is central to data collection, as well as the entire process of developing safe operational environments.
A hazard fulfills ALL the following criteria:
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) defines a hazard as,
“A condition that could foreseeably cause or contribute to an aircraft accident...” (14 CFR § 5.5).
Other compliance agencies have similarly worded definitions for hazards, and all of them fulfill the above bullet points.
Hazards are most often mistaken as:
While benign objects are not inherently dangerous, they can become hazards in the right context. For example, a building is not a hazard. But a tall building in proximity to the flight path is a hazard.
The concept of “Risk” is where things get most confusing, as there are two ways the word can be used. Like hazards, context matters.
You can use the word risk in the context of:
The key marker of a specific risk occurrence is damages. If you are discussing a particular negative outcome in a safety issue, you are talking about a specific risk.
Risk (in general) is generally documented and quantifying risk with a risk matrix. Quantifying risk involves:
When we are talking about “a risk” or “risk identification”, we are talking about a risk occurrence.
Hazard occurrence may or may not result in risk occurrence.
Many other contributing factors bridge the gap between hazards and risk occurrence, such as:
Hazard occurrence can result in risk occurrence very quickly, such as in a matter of minutes. Hazard occurrence can also result in risk occurrence over the course of a long time. It simply depends on the situation.
You should understand relevant hazards and risks in your aviation SMS programs through the lens of the above points.
A hazard will have a very hard time resulting in risk occurrence given:
Let’s also not forget that there is an element of luck in risk avoidance. That being said, SMS programs that prepare employees and the operational environment well should be able to avoid a vast majority of risk occurrences.
Being able to identify hazard vs risk occurrence while managing a safety issue simply involves having a good understanding of:
Then it’s simply a matter of lining out each step of the issue and identifying which step best fits the criteria for a hazard and which step best fits the criteria for a risk occurrence. Of course, not all issues have a hazard or risk occurrence.
Guidance for hazard identification and risk occurrence identification does not have to be complicated. In fact, the more straightforward the guidance, the better.
Some good practices for providing hazard reporting guidance are:
Following these guidelines is a fantastic way to ensure that employees recognize what to report, and know how to report it.
For more resources on hazards vs risks, the following resources should prove very helpful.
Last updated August 2024.