Every aviation safety manager is familiar with the risk matrix, particularly the 5x5 model. Risk matrices are a vital tool in aviation safety management systems (SMS), enabling organizations to assess and prioritize risks by combining their probability and severity.
This comprehensive guide outlines how aviation safety managers can define these criteria to customize an effective, organization-specific risk matrix to be used in their aviation SMS.
A risk matrix is a visual tool used in aviation safety to evaluate risks by plotting their likelihood against their potential impact. It helps safety managers decide which risks need immediate action and which can be monitored. According to the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), risk matrices are standard in safety management systems (SMS) for assessing hazards in a structured way.
Defining probability and severity ensures that risk assessments are consistent and meaningful. Probability indicates how likely a hazard is to occur, while severity measures the potential harm if it does. Clear definitions make the matrix a reliable decision-making tool.
Every aviation organization is unique, so the risk matrix must reflect specific operational realities. For example, in Alaska, where weather-related incidents are more common, probability levels might be adjusted to account for frequent adverse conditions. The FAA’s Alaska Aviation Safety Initiative highlights the need for tailored risk management in such environments. Engage experts and stakeholders to set criteria that align with your organization’s goals and regulatory requirements.
Begin by adopting a standard framework, like the 5x5 matrix from ICAO, which uses five probability and severity levels. Then, customize these levels based on your data and operational context. Regularly test and update the matrix to keep it effective, as recommended by the FAA Advisory Circular 120-92.
A well-defined risk matrix is the cornerstone of effective aviation safety management. By systematically evaluating the probability and severity of potential hazards, safety managers can
This guide provides a detailed roadmap for aviation safety managers to define probability and severity criteria for a risk matrix, ensuring it is tailored to their organization’s unique needs. Drawing from authoritative sources like the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), this article offers practical steps, examples, and best practices to create an impactful and evergreen risk matrix.
In aviation, where safety is prioritized by necessity, a risk matrix serves as a critical tool within safety management systems (SMS). It is a grid that combines the likelihood (probability) of a hazard occurring with the potential impact (severity) of its consequences. The resulting risk level—often color-coded as green (acceptable), yellow (acceptable with mitigation), or red (unacceptable)—guides decision-making.
According to the ICAO Safety Management Manual (Doc 9859), risk matrices are ubiquitous in aviation SMS, enabling organizations to quantify and prioritize risks systematically. For aviation safety managers, defining clear probability and severity criteria is essential to ensure the matrix is both intuitive and effective.
What is Probability?
Probability refers to the likelihood that a hazard will result in an adverse event. In a risk matrix, probability is typically categorized into levels to simplify assessments. The ICAO Safety Management Manual provides a standard 5-level scale:
| Probability Level | Description | ICAO Definition |
|---|---|---|
| Frequent (5) | Likely to occur many times | Has occurred frequently |
| Occasional (4) | Likely to occur sometimes | Has occurred infrequently |
| Remote (3) | Unlikely but possible | Has occurred rarely |
| Improbable (2) | Very unlikely to occur | Not known to have occurred |
| Extremely Improbable (1) | Almost inconceivable | Almost inconceivable that the event will occur |
How to Define Probability Criteria
To define probability levels, organizations can use quantitative or qualitative approaches, depending on available data. Quantitative methods rely on historical data, such as the number of incidents per flight hour or operation. For example, a small Alaskan air taxi operator might define “Frequent” as more than 10 weather-related incidents per year, given the region’s challenging conditions, as noted in the FAA’s Alaska Aviation Safety Initiative. Qualitative methods, useful when data is limited, rely on expert judgment and descriptive terms like “likely” or “rare.”
To set probability criteria:
What is Severity?
Severity measures the potential impact of a hazard if it occurs, considering consequences like safety, financial loss, environmental damage, or operational disruption. The ICAO Safety Management Manual outlines five severity levels:
| Severity Level | Description | ICAO Definition |
|---|---|---|
| Catastrophic (A) | Multiple deaths, equipment destroyed | Multiple deaths and/or destruction of equipment |
| Hazardous (B) | Serious injury, major equipment damage | Large reduction in safety margins, serious injury |
| Major (C) | Injury to persons, serious incident | Significant reduction in safety margins, injury |
| Minor (D) | Minor incident, operating limitations | Nuisance, use of emergency procedures |
| Negligible (E) | Few consequences | Little consequences |
How to Define Severity Criteria
Severity criteria should reflect the organization’s operational context and risk tolerance. For example, a small aviation company might consider a $1 million loss catastrophic, while a large airline might classify it as major. SMS Pro's configurable risk matrix follows best practices and allows using multiple consequence categories, such as:
To define severity criteria:
A generic risk matrix may not suit every organization. Customization ensures the matrix reflects specific risks and operational realities. For instance, Alaskan operators face unique challenges like controlled flight into terrain (CFIT), which accounts for many fatal crashes, per the CDC’s Alaska Aviation Safety page. A tailored matrix might assign higher probability to weather-related risks and higher severity to incidents in remote areas.
Steps to Customize the Risk Matrix
Example: Canadian Air Taxi Operator
Consider a small air taxi operator in northern Alberta assessing the risk of flying in marginal weather. Using a customized risk matrix, they define “Occasional” (4) as weather-related incidents occurring 1-5 times per year, given northern Alberta's frequent storms. Severity is set as “Hazardous” (B) due to potential serious injury in remote areas with delayed rescue. The resulting risk index (4B) falls in the red zone, prompting the operator to implement stricter weather minimums or delay flights, aligning with recommendations from the FAA’s Alaska Aviation Safety Initiative.
Case Study: Large Airline
A major airline might define “Catastrophic” as a crash costing over $50 million and multiple fatalities, while “Negligible” is a minor delay costing less than $50,000. By analyzing historical data, they set “Frequent” as more than 10 minor incidents per year. This tailored matrix helps prioritize risks like engine failures over less critical issues like cabin equipment malfunctions, as outlined in the SKYbrary Risk Assessment Matrix Samples.
As an example, Alaska’s aviation environment presents unique challenges, including
The CDC’s Alaska Aviation Safety page notes that over one-third of U.S. air taxi and commuter accidents occur in Alaska, often due to CFIT. Safety managers should:
Defining probability and severity for a risk matrix is a critical task for aviation safety managers. By adopting a structured approach—using clear criteria, customizing for organizational and regional factors, and following best practices—managers can create a robust tool that enhances safety.
Regular review and stakeholder engagement ensure the matrix remains relevant, while examples like remote Alaskan operations highlight the importance of context. A well-defined risk matrix not only meets regulatory requirements but also fosters a proactive safety culture, ultimately protecting lives and assets in the aviation industry.
Need SMS tools with customizable risk matrix abilities? SMS Pro has this and much more.