The Iceberg of Ignorance was first developed in 1989 by a consultant named Sidney Yoshida. The Iceberg of Ignorance is a model that addressed concerns about safety awareness in large organizations. This model contends that of all problems:
The idea is that management is only aware of the “tip of the iceberg.” This model has some rather obvious problems, namely that:
However, this model does identify the important fact that:
In aviation SMS, this model is probably more useful when slightly reconstructed as being an awareness of quality vs. quantity:
This idea seems rather obvious: top managers are much more concerned with the “serious” problems, and front-line employees are concerned with the minor issues that cause frustration every day.
But the other reality is that most organizations simply don’t have a meaningful way for the “minor issues” to go all the way up the communication ladder for top managers to be aware of them.
These are important truths that lead to many preventable accidents and incidents every year.
The reason the Iceberg of Ignorance (reconstructed) matters is because of one important point:
One study found that for:
As decision-makers, if top managers can be more aware of the “minor” issues and conditions, they have the power to stop these issues/conditions before they lead to a serious incident. This is why the Iceberg of Ignorance matters to top managers and employees.
To overcome this issue:
Overcoming this issue happens primarily through changing your hazard reporting system requirements.
Overcome ignorance in your SMS requires:
In real-world terms, it looks like this: all issues should be reported, even trivial concerns. Trivial concerns lead to bigger problems. Reporting all concerns requires a bit more work on the part of safety managers having to manage these issues. However, it ensures safety managers make decisions based on an awareness of all the data, rather than just the ostensible problems.
Last updated in June 2024.